Although they insist that they did not fail to lose the same amount of votes is removed, for me, a failure.
'll have to see what happened and why the polls were wrong by much. That is very striking. Blog
The following explanation is given somewhat extreme in my opinion but it has some points that I see potential. Supporting
Antanas Mockus is the most sensible. Failure to do so is to close the road to a better future.
Home, National Review, columnist Emma
Flood.
June 1, 2010 11:28 a.m.
The unexpected results of the first ballot should be a stimulus for a major effort by the opposition and not in a centrifugal force weakens.
The results of the vote favored Santos thanks to its large cash resources, its huge political machine, to help JJRendón cloudy, José Obdulio Gaviria and Fernando Londoño, international organizations, intervention of the president. The amount of money invested in his campaign is huge, we saw something and see the U up in the soup. They say the campaign was great Mockus online, and if it was but much larger was that of Uribe took 200 people dedicated to the campaign in this way. The U was present not only on Facebook and Twitter but in any website they visit Colombians here and abroad. Antanas Mockus won
the not inconsiderable sum of more than 600 thousand votes 3millones is itself a triumph if we take into account not from any political apparatus, fraud, gilts, checks or cash.
But the decisive element for Santos to win the first race, in all cases was the ignorance of some, the poor, and the dishonesty of others.
Ignorance "Ignorance of the poorest (1.2 layers and part of 3) is the result of the persistence of right-wing governments in Colombian history who bit interested in educating the that being poor and ignorant will vote to decide who the dominant power. Dishonesty-
hard to say, much more acceptable but which do not vote for ignorance Uribe vote for dishonesty. Those seeking patronage shares voted and will vote for Santos. Those who do not flinch at the continuation of war as an instrument to benefit those who trade with it rather than to defeat the guerrillas, Santos will vote over the blood of soldiers of the homeland and wandering the displaced. Those who choose violent solution that kills many to protect the wealth of a few, also voted and will vote for Santos. The millions of Colombians who seem not to know the value of solidarity elected to anything that promises more benefit them even if it means that nothing is left for those who really need it, the always neglected, which even there is hope.
naivety "There are some naive, but these, if they are educated, have an obligation to learn to stop being so. We are not in Europe where no one is starving because of some naive who can not vote. The
Lambone and patronage-A swaggering many Colombians like the candidate who sweeps it uses any means to gain power even if it is a candidate known for lying and unfair. They feel "very presidential" the candidate Santos and his followers have been treated with contempt saying Mockus triumphant candidate to withdraw to save the cost of his campaign that could make money for education. And you wonder You think about that when the current government is investing almost 6% of GDP in the war
not want to change "But there is a cloak that covers almost all: not wanting to change. The notable exceptions are always individuals or groups of individuals who bear all the work and the imcomprensión of other citizens. So rigid is the structure of no change in Colombia there are many Colombians who prefer that nothing changes because they distrust even his own mother, but distrust of the corrupt. They prefer to be among the most backward countries of South America before taking the time to review what each candidate really offers, and more importantly if you can believe such a candidate both for its history as the credibility of its proposals.
Many Liberal Party Liberal Party members want to join Santos because they can not get jobs and perks for his own party, and do not mind to emigrate to the U. I feel sorry for Rafael Pardo, excellent candidate to be added to the failure of his campaign, the indignity of his colleagues.
The Polo-The votes obtained by Petro was also important and a very good prognosis for not too distant future, if you know how to handle. Petro was able to finally show their political project (the best) and as president despite the onslaught of Uribe and the ongoing smear campaign over the past eight years. But in the meantime I think the Polo should join Mockus. The white vote is proposed by some political suicide polo players, the white vote is a luxury of more developed European countries. The failure of Polo in the mayoral election in La Calera in 2007 when they voted blank, you should make them think. If Polo joins Mockus and continues to campaign with effort could win Mockus and open the way to the Pole in 2014. To do otherwise would give passively the power to indefinitely Uribe and promote the deepening of authoritarianism. . The political masochism leads to death of the parties. Radical Change
Vargas Lleras also Mockus should join if it is true that spoke in the debate on corruption in the current government.
now, "Green Party The Green Party, should be shifted from singing about what life is sacred-that is, to the specific statement of his proposals on how you plan to feed the hungry, give them work, health and education that is the way to honor this principle of respect for life. Because for people with poor education, the enunciation of moral principles social solidarity or no meaning if not accompanied by concrete plans and easily understood.
Those who vote for Santos "They must know they are voting for someone who makes proposals apparently good but what is not known is whether these are to meet. Because it is not credible assertion when he says he will not raise taxes. And they will have to rise and the worst part is that the increase will be for employees because it says it will not remove the exemptions for foreign investors to "encourage investor confidence." The truth is that what an investor needs are clear rules and interesting business, and this does not depend on tax exemptions. They also say that I know well, that Santos can not be
believe should also know that saints are not interested in peace, what interests him is to low to the commanders but that does not change the situation because the guerrillas continues its own war strategy as the government does not offer anything better. What is as active as the business of the FARC's coca is the business of war is not in the hands of the FARC but friends of the servants of the state.
Santos has lied about Operation Jaque, has betrayed Ecuador, has been linked to those who want to destabilize the government of Venezuela.
has been a major driver of the rewards for informers, the provision has remained 029 favoring false positives, and all the etcetera that we all know. The voting for Santos becomes complicit in their actions and behavior.
The Santistas scream that will "finish" on June 20, the other must vote by Mockus.
emmaflood@etb.net.co
http://polog.blogsome.com/2010/06/01/respaldar-a-antanas-mockus-es-lo-mas-sensato-no-hacerlo-es- close-the-road-to-a-better-future /
